On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, mattam@netcourrier.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:01:37AM -0500, Lars Clausen wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, mattam@netcourrier.com wrote:
>> >
>> > Well, the menu code was much of an experiment and I didn't finish it
>> > :) I'm gonna fix this right now, thanks for the pointer. I'll add
>> > switches for attributes and operations visibility as well. Any other
>> > switch someone think of ?
>>
>> Abstract class, template class, maybe Suppress Attributes/Operations (I
>> never liked that visible+suppressed thing, is that a normal UML thing?
>>
>
> I attached a patch for the class object menu with switches for
> visible comments, attributes or operations, and abstract and template
> class toggles. It uses a workaround to have the menu labels dynamically
> change (show/hide).
As I threatened, I added to the object menu structure the ability to use
CheckMenuItems. What was formerly just a boolean field active is now a
flag field with flags
DIAMENU_ACTIVE -- user can select the item
DIAMENU_TOGGLE -- this item is a CheckMenuItem
DIAMENU_TOGGLE_ON -- this CheckMenuItem should be checked.
I think that should cover the things you want to do, so you don't need to
do that workaround, but can just have a static structure like in line.c
> I'm not sure Template class switch is useful, since you need to
> type formal parameters, but why not?
Oh, right. Doesn't make much sense, then. The checkbox for Template class
in the dialog should go away, then.
> I do not understand what suppress attributes/operations do, as
> they have the same behavior as show attributes/operations. Am I wrong?
> Anyway I don't think they have anything to do with UML, so we can get
> rid of it if nobody sees it as a must.
They were added by Alex.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?