Re: Visible UML Comments

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Alan Horkan wrote:
> 
> 
>> We were talking about the UML objects, but if we extend the object menu
>> mechanism anyway, it could apply to shapes, too.  Though better would
>> probably be to have a generic way to keep aspectratio (Shift-drag,
>> perhaps).
> 
> There are a few bug reports about having the mouse cursor change for
> various reasons.
> 
> The behaviour i would expect would that if you pull the boxes on
> the centre of the vertical/horizontal side the object would only be
> resized vertically/horzintally.
> 
> I did expect the diagonal to resize both equally but i am probably just
> imagining it as both OpenOffice Draw and PowerPoint allows free resize
> from the diagonal corner.

Yes, that is the most common behaviour.  I don't know if there's a common
way to do aspect ratio.

> While i am being offtopic... (my bad)
> would it be easy to adapt the rounded rectantle in the UML sheet to be a
> generic Rounded Rectangle?

The standard box is actually roundable.

> should i file either of these in bugizlla for tracking?

Please file something about the aspect ratio, yes.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?