On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> Those were the problems I was referring to :). I think I was
> getting mixed up with my terminology: I see your point and I
> think I understand. I won't worry about it too much then. I was
> thinking of old-fashoned ANSI (255 chars) --- I have to admit I
> have no idea how this maps onto character sets these days,
> though I think what I'm thinking of basically is Latin-1.
> That's the same as ISO 8859-1, right?
Yes, that's indeed the very same '-1':)
> In fact, the more I think about this, the more I get confused.
> I can't seem to find any good introduction/references to all
> this stuff on the web. Does anyone know where I can go to learn
> more about character sets etc. these days?
Ick... no, not really.
> I will leave the output as it is, write the AUTHORS dependency
> etc., and then the bug can be closed.
Sounds good.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?