Re: RE: dia-0.89

[Rui Miguel Seabra <rms multicert com>]

On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 13:27, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le ven, sep 07, 2001, à 07:18:50 -0500, Jamin Collins a écrit:
> I think RMS was speaking about the MD5sum, not the tarball...

Please, rms... I'm not Stallman :)

> (which reminds me it would perhaps be a nice idea to include MD5sums of the
> snapshots as well, though I wonder how to make this tamper-proof short of
> manually typing my GPG key every day at 9:25am)

md5sums can be done automatically easily.

a gpg signature is somewhat more painful :)

however, gpg signing it would be quite nice for the releases!

Hugs (and thanks for the attention), rms

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?

PGP signature